#IEDAction
Wednesday, January 28, 2015
Canada: A System That Fails Those With Eating Disorders
Labels:
#activism
,
#advocacy
,
#anorexia
,
#Bellletstalk.
,
#bulimia
,
#cdnpoli
,
#eating disorder
,
#EDAW2015
,
#IEDAction
,
#NIED
,
Canada EDAW
Canada: A Rural Zipcode Should NOT Mean No Help
Labels:
#anorexia
,
#Bellletstalk.
,
#bulimia
,
#cdnpoli
,
#consumer campaign
,
#eating disorder
,
#eatingdisorders
,
#EDAW2015
,
#IEDAction
,
#mentalhealth
,
#NIED
,
Canada EDAW
Tuesday, January 27, 2015
Canada: A Journey to Recovery Shouldn't have to Mean a Trip to the U.S.
Ashley's Story
I am 31 and a survivor of an eating disorder which included restricting and over exercising. After a seven-year struggle, I am now almost eight years in recovery.
I started struggling at 16 after I was put on a then new anti-psychotic for depression. As a result of that, I gained a significant amount of weight in just under six weeks. I was then told to diet and exercise, but with no oversight. Within months, I was deep into the eating disorder.
I finally sought help at the age of 19 through Interior Health at the outpatient eating disorder program in Kelowna, BC in 2003. I was only able to participate in the outpatient program for a few months because I was too unwell to benefit from it. I was not able to access a higher level of care through St. Paul’s in Vancouver despite needing it due to unrealistic expectations of being able to eat all meals and snacks and gaining weight before I was allowed to participate in that particular program (which was the entire reason I needed a higher level of care to begin with!).
I was medically monitored and had a psychiatrist as well as case managers from 2003 to 2008 but with no other treatment for the eating disorder. Despite inquiring again two or so times about a higher level of care, I was still unable to access it for several reasons. The wait list as of 2006 was an estimated nine months for a component of St. Paul’s program.
I tried to get better on my own but was not successful.
I was finally able to get treatment in a residential center in the U.S. in 2007 thanks to the help of a man I met online who had followed me via a video blog I did sharing my struggles with mental health, the eating disorder, and trying to get much needed help.
During those seven years, I experienced severe gaps in care, inadequate treatment because I supposedly was not physically or psychiatrically unwell enough for hospital admission. I had ill-equipped ER physicians/nurses when it came to patients with mental health issues; this almost led to my death in 2003 after being sent home where my appendix burst, leading to emergency surgery the following day due to lack of appropriate testing and assuming it was a mental health issue. This and other experiences have left me with very little help and little faith in the system.
I started struggling at 16 after I was put on a then new anti-psychotic for depression. As a result of that, I gained a significant amount of weight in just under six weeks. I was then told to diet and exercise, but with no oversight. Within months, I was deep into the eating disorder.
I finally sought help at the age of 19 through Interior Health at the outpatient eating disorder program in Kelowna, BC in 2003. I was only able to participate in the outpatient program for a few months because I was too unwell to benefit from it. I was not able to access a higher level of care through St. Paul’s in Vancouver despite needing it due to unrealistic expectations of being able to eat all meals and snacks and gaining weight before I was allowed to participate in that particular program (which was the entire reason I needed a higher level of care to begin with!).
I was medically monitored and had a psychiatrist as well as case managers from 2003 to 2008 but with no other treatment for the eating disorder. Despite inquiring again two or so times about a higher level of care, I was still unable to access it for several reasons. The wait list as of 2006 was an estimated nine months for a component of St. Paul’s program.
I tried to get better on my own but was not successful.
I was finally able to get treatment in a residential center in the U.S. in 2007 thanks to the help of a man I met online who had followed me via a video blog I did sharing my struggles with mental health, the eating disorder, and trying to get much needed help.
During those seven years, I experienced severe gaps in care, inadequate treatment because I supposedly was not physically or psychiatrically unwell enough for hospital admission. I had ill-equipped ER physicians/nurses when it came to patients with mental health issues; this almost led to my death in 2003 after being sent home where my appendix burst, leading to emergency surgery the following day due to lack of appropriate testing and assuming it was a mental health issue. This and other experiences have left me with very little help and little faith in the system.
It was only when that one person stepped in and gave me the chance I needed--what I had been fighting for over all years--that helped save my life. I do not believe I would have ever received the necessary treatment I needed in B.C., as all these years later so many still struggle to get desperately needed adequate treatment. Without that help--not from Canada, but in another country--I do not believe I would be here today.
Labels:
#anorexia
,
#Bellletstalk.
,
#bulimia
,
#cdnpoli
,
#consumer campaign
,
#eating disorder
,
#eatingdisorders
,
#EDAW2015
,
#IEDAction
,
#mental eating disorder
,
Canada EDAW
,
eating disorders
Friday, January 23, 2015
Canada: When Things Go Right (ish)
My name is Julie, and I am a mother of four, one son and three daughters, the last two being twins. We are a happy, normal family. I am primarily a stay-at-home mother, with a self-employed husband who usually works from home. I live just outside of a small town in Ontario.
When "G", my youngest, was approaching her 17th birthday, I noticed changes in her mood as well as body. She was an excellent student and rugby player. As the summer rolled around and she turned 17, there was a noticeable weight loss and mood changes as she focused on eating "healthy."
Now with protruding bones and seemingly very depressed, I knew we were dealing with anorexia and depression. I got her an appointment with the Family and Youth Clinic at Peterborough Regional Hospital, one hour away, with a team of a social worker, nurse practitioner and dietitian, as well as our local family doctor. Blood tests indicated malnourishment, ECG showed a very dangerously low heart rate and mentally she was unstable, saying she had a plan for suicide. She was always tired and cold. She was no longer the daughter I knew. She was withdrawn, moody, sometimes mildly violent and started to self harm.
As her BMI dropped below 16, I was told she would be put on a wait list for SickKids or CHEO. I was told the wait was 3 to 6 months. At this point I worried that her organs, particularly her weak heart, would deteriorate to the point of shutting down. I knew my daughter was dying.
Since she was so medically unstable, and our timing was right, "G" ended up jumping the queue at SickKids and spent a month there.Ten months of outpatient treatment at PRHC, with a psychiatrist added to the team, she was discharged and is now away at college where she sees a nurse practitioner once per week.
My daughter was one of the lucky ones. I got her into treatment quickly, mainly from my own research; my doctor has had no experience in dealing with eating disorders and could not help except to run tests and monitor her vitals. She had to learn along the way, which did not instill confidence in me as a parent of a very sick child. My daughter was treated quickly due to her medical instability, but unfortunately she had to be close to death to get that treatment.
Now away at college and "in recovery" my daughter is responsible for her own health. If she relapses, the story will be different. It may not have the same happy ending as resources are sadly lacking for her age group (young adults 18 - 25). In the meantime I stay vigilant and continue to research ways in which to help her.
Labels:
#activism
,
#advocacy
,
#anorexia
,
#bulimia
,
#cdnpoli
,
#consumer campaign
,
#eating disorder
,
#eatingdisorders
,
#EDAW2015
,
#IEDAction
,
#mentalhealth
,
#NIED
,
Canada EDAW
Thursday, January 22, 2015
Canada: Eating Disorder Awareness Week (and beyond) Action
Purpose: These stories will be used to bring attention to
the myriad ways in which the healthcare system fails those with eating
disorders. They are also used to highlight that full recovery is possible in
properly functioning medical and treatment systems. This balance is important.
Responsible story telling includes not using sensational
photos or numbers as these may be subverted for unsafe use and we don’t want
that. We also don’t want to reinforce a message that only those who are
dramatically thin are sick.
WHO: Briefly tell us who you are and who your loved one is.
The more people realize our families/children are just like theirs, the more
likely they are to see themselves in our stories.
WHAT: What is the diagnosis, how long they/you have been ill
and where the person is now in terms of recovery? Try to tell the story using medical
language that people will understand.
WHERE: Be specific about where your healthcare is delivered
and who is responsible for delivering that healthcare. Please include your
postal or zip code.
WHY: This is the bulk of your story—we want to highlight
places along the way that were pivotal---delay in diagnosis, waiting times for
services, lack of services, uninformed physicians, hospitals, etc. Discuss lack
of education or outdated information given to you by clinicians. If you have
gone outside the system discuss the tremendous financial and other sacrifices
you have made. Conversely, if you have a story where things have gone well,
share what makes your story different from most of the stories we encounter.
FINAL THOUGHTS: We
are trying to paint a visceral picture so small details can be important. The
word limit is 500 words and if you have non-triggering photos to include that
is very helpful. Use of your own name is great, but it’s absolutely fine to use
pseudonyms. The pieces will be edited, but overall content/message will not be
altered.
Email your story to iedaction.global@gmail.com with a
cc to info@nied.ca
We will be using these
hashtags on social media: #cdnpoli #EDAW2015 #IEDAction so please check and retweet
these on a regular basis.
Please visit our website, like our FB page, and follow us on Twitter: Our voices are amplified when we raise them
TOGETHER!
EXAMPLE
My name is Lisa and I live in Mississauga, Ontario; I have two incredible daughters, an amazing fiancé, and assorted animals. Both my girls have struggled with mental illnesses for many years. My youngest daughter has a diagnosis of anorexia, binge-purge subtype.
Though M. was
diagnosed in October of 2011 at 17, we had already been enduring a nightmare
for many years. From the time she was 9 or 10 years old, we spent more time in
doctors offices and hospital emergency rooms than I can remember, due
to complaints of constant stomach upset, constipation,
lethargy. We once spent 15 hours in the ER of Toronto's premier Sick
Kid's Hospital when she was 12 because she hadn't eaten anything solid for over
2 weeks, was persistently vomiting and sleeping 15 hours per day. Her anxiety
became crippling.
At 15, she started
to eat "healthy.” This meant virtually no dairy, no pasta, no bread, no
baked goods (and yet she would bake up a storm) and eventually no
meat. Her energy levels continued to drop and her hair became dry and
brittle, off we went again to our family GP who offered no real help and said
she was just a "teenager going through the natural progression of working
towards independence.” At 16, shopping for summer clothes and bathing
suits my heart stopped and life as we knew it came to an end. This time
our GP suggested, upon discovering a terrifying weight loss of a quarter of her
weight that I send my daughter to Africa to "see what starving children
really look like."
At no point did our
GP say “”eating disorder,” though she did say “willful,” “disrespectful,”
“manipulation,” “depression,” and “conniving.” At the end of my
daughter's 16th year we were FINALLY referred to an eating disorder
therapist. Upon diagnosis we were told that on a scale of 1-10, my
daughter's eating disorder was so entrenched it was a 15. We were also told
that due to my daughters age, she turned 17 days after diagnosis, that we would
likely run out of time to save her before the age of 18 when she would become
an adult, effectively ending our parental right to save her life.
Even after her
diagnosis, one that was clearly delayed due to lack of education on our GP’s
part, we were never steered toward good medical or psychological information
that was vital to helping our daughter. What we did experience
were interminably long wait lists, being denied access to services either
because our daughter was to sick or not sick enough and wholly inadequate
number of beds in dedicated facilities.
Today I have a
daughter who teeters constantly on the brink of medical hospital admissions and
still has no real help for her eating disorder. I do what I can to find
adequate resources for her and I live with the constant dread that whatever
help I may find will not come in time to save my daughter’s life.
This project is collaboration
with National Initiative for Eating Disorders (NIED).
Labels:
#cdnpoli
,
#EDAW2015
,
#IEDAction
,
#NIED
,
activism
,
advocacy
,
anorexia
,
bulimia
,
Canada EDAW
,
consumer campaign
,
eating disorder
,
eating disorder hope
,
eating disorders
Sunday, January 18, 2015
Kohl's: We Expect Better From You
In general, Kohl's has a better track record than retailers like American Apparel, Hollister, Urban Outfitters, TopShop and others who consistently promote a thin-bias that is weight-stigmatizing and incorporates messages of shame for those who don't meet a narrow guideline of body acceptability (the type that 5% of women and girls possess naturally).
That may be why we are so disappointed in this offering from the weekly catalog from January15-25, 2015.
(As eating disorder activists we are careful to note at all times the difference between eating disorders and disordered eating as EDs are biological, brain-based illnesses and disordered eating is both more common and is not a pathology. The images we are discussing do NOT cause eating disorders. They ARE harmful to all of us and do contribute to a toxic societal environment that can make recovery from an eating disorder difficult).
How is the message on this graphic tee harmful?
- It promotes calorie-burning as a moral imperative.
- It encourages exercise as a calorie-burning, weight loss activity rather than one important for general health and fitness.
- It sends a message that a female should elevate calorie-burning before all other activities (actually, it's reminiscent of the Maria Kang What's Your Excuse? debacle).
- It sends a message that all those who don't fit a narrow stereotype do so because they are lazy excuse-makers.
We hope you will join us on Twitter in letting @Kohls understand that #IEDAction is #NotBuyingIt when they choose to market a message to us and to our daughters that promotes a false ideal that an a ability to burn calories defines girls and women. It does not.
Eating Disorder Hope: Starting A Dialogue
For some time, a group of advocates has been concerned about the content of the website Eating Disorder Hope (EDH). The site is designed to have an educational feel yet many articles were outdated and promoted the debunked psychosomatic family illness model (the eating disorder as an expression of family dysfunction). The situation was similar to the Something Fishy website in that a high SEO ranking means many people searching for information land on this page.
Members of International Eating Disorder Action sought to begin a conversation with queries sent to the Contact Us information on the site and via blog and Facebook comments and tweets on pieces whose content we objected to. Our comments and missives were direct yet never abusive. With all reasonable attempts to open a productive dialogue stymied, one of our members (JD Ouellette) filed a BBB complaint on the grounds the connections between the information and the advertising was not clear enough.
We are pleased to announce that a dialogue began on Twitter with IED member E.C. and that we have seen a big shift in the postings on the site. Thank you to all who helped with comments and tweets. Access to the most up-to-date research, and information about the evidence-based treatments informed by that research, is of the highest priority and we are pleased that EDH has decided to show their commitment to the HOPE portion of their name by publishing content that supports this mission.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Letter to Eating Disorder Hope sent by Amy Cunningham of IEDAction and their response:
Dear Ms. Cunningham,
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
These are specific blog posts we commented upon as representative of our concerns that while lip service was paid to families not being responsible for eating disorders the message reinforced the psychosomatic family illness model of parent blaming.
Coming Home from College: Eating Disorders and College Breaks by Dr. Gregory Jantz
Overcoming Family Conflict During Eating Disorder Recovery by Katie Thompson, MS, LPC, NCC, CEDS from Castlewood Treatment Center
Communication Skills for Families in Recovery by Dr. Gregory Jantz
The Link Between High-Achieving Families and Eating Disorders
Members of International Eating Disorder Action sought to begin a conversation with queries sent to the Contact Us information on the site and via blog and Facebook comments and tweets on pieces whose content we objected to. Our comments and missives were direct yet never abusive. With all reasonable attempts to open a productive dialogue stymied, one of our members (JD Ouellette) filed a BBB complaint on the grounds the connections between the information and the advertising was not clear enough.
We are pleased to announce that a dialogue began on Twitter with IED member E.C. and that we have seen a big shift in the postings on the site. Thank you to all who helped with comments and tweets. Access to the most up-to-date research, and information about the evidence-based treatments informed by that research, is of the highest priority and we are pleased that EDH has decided to show their commitment to the HOPE portion of their name by publishing content that supports this mission.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Letter to Eating Disorder Hope sent by Amy Cunningham of IEDAction and their response:
Thank you so much for your willingness to listen, engage and
dialogue about the content of Eating Disorder Hope. It may be helpful for you to understand that
our mission at International Eating Disorder Action includes being a watchdog
for outdated information and promoting the dissemination of evidence-based
information.
We believe that societal viewpoints that consider eating
disorders to be disorders of choice, vanity and family dynamics instead of
brain-based, biological illnesses negatively impact early diagnosis, access to
aggressive, appropriate level-of-care treatment and research funding parity.
As you know, the last few years have seen an explosion in
research findings surrounding eating disorders. Still, some clinicians find it
difficult to let go of what they “know.” For so long, eating disorder treatment
and practice was based on the psychosomatic family illness model and that has
driven practice. This is not to assign blame—everyone was doing the best they
could with the information they had at the time.
We do have new information now and we need to use that
information to promote early diagnosis, access to aggressive, appropriate
level-of-care treatment and research funding parity. We have to operate with
caution when we share information about eating disorders.
Without line-editing previous posts (as that puts an onus on
us to approve content and that is not an appropriate role for us), we feel that
a strong editorial policy would give submitters the guidance required.
Questions to ask are:
·
Is there solid and current evidence the
statements in this piece are true? Are there citations to verify this?
·
Is there a possibility this piece is reinforcing
myths and disproven stereotypes?
·
Does the information in this piece represent
solid research or anecdotal evidence?
·
Does the information in this piece promote
evidence-based treatment?
·
Does the information in this piece empower
parents/carers to help their loved one or does it disempower them by blaming
them (even inadvertently) for the eating disorder?
·
Does the piece state that eating disorders are
preventable (there is no evidence for this yet)?
·
An editorial policy such as that outlined above, combined
with encouraging dialogue and discussion in the comments without a defensive
posture, should lead to positive changes which fulfill the idea of providing
hope to those whose lives are touched by eating disorders.
Dear Ms. Cunningham,
Greetings and Happy New Year to you as well! Thank you kindly for taking the time to submit this invaluable feedback. We appreciate the constructive dialogue that we have been able to have thus far and gladly receive your suggestions and input. We deeply respect the insight and feedback from our community and the group of parents/survivors that you represent.
I will be sharing this letter with our organization's president and our other team members, and we will move forward with discussion about how to best integrate the helpful suggestions you have outlined. We sincerely look forward to collaborating together to further promote our mutual goals and missions.
Thank you again for your time, efforts, and for the tremendous work you are doing in the eating disorder community.
With Warmest Regards,
Crystal Karges
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
These are specific blog posts we commented upon as representative of our concerns that while lip service was paid to families not being responsible for eating disorders the message reinforced the psychosomatic family illness model of parent blaming.
Coming Home from College: Eating Disorders and College Breaks by Dr. Gregory Jantz
Overcoming Family Conflict During Eating Disorder Recovery by Katie Thompson, MS, LPC, NCC, CEDS from Castlewood Treatment Center
Communication Skills for Families in Recovery by Dr. Gregory Jantz
The Link Between High-Achieving Families and Eating Disorders
Friday, January 9, 2015
National Eating Disorder Information Center (NEDIC) Action
January
9, 2015
Meryl Bear, M.Ed.
Meryl Bear, M.Ed.
Director,
NEDIC
National
Eating Disorder Information Center
ES
7-421, 200 Elizabeth Street
Toronto,
Ontario M5G 2C4
Dear Meryl Bear,
Recently you have heard, on Twitter and Facebook and via email, from members of International Eating Disorder Action (IED Action) about concerns we have with your recently unveiled “Zero Calories” awareness poster. It may be helpful for you to understand that our mission at IED Action includes being a watchdog for outdated information and promoting the dissemination of evidence-based information.
We believe that societal viewpoints that consider eating disorders to be disorders of choice, vanity and family dynamics instead of brain-based, biological illnesses negatively impact early diagnosis, access to aggressive, appropriate level-of-care treatment and research funding parity.
We are hopeful that you will be open to a dialogue with us as we are both puzzled by the Zero Calories campaign and concerned over the amount of outdated information we found as we explored your website; we are also troubled by the contention that eating disorders are preventable as there is no evidence to show that to be true.
As you know, the last few years have seen an explosion in research findings surrounding eating disorders. For so long eating disorder treatment and practice was based on the psychosomatic family illness model and that has informed much of the content we see on your site.
We do have new information now and we need to use that information to promote early diagnosis, access to aggressive, appropriate level-of-care treatment and research funding parity. We have to operate with caution when we share information about eating disorders.
We ask that you undertake a review of your site’s content and your mission of awareness by using these guidelines to vet the content.
A review should entail assessing the following:
· Is there solid and current evidence the statements in this piece are true? Are there citations to verify this?
· Is there a possibility this piece is reinforcing myths and disproven stereotypes?
· Does the information in this piece represent solid research or anecdotal evidence?
· Does the information in this piece promote evidence-based treatment?
· Does the information in this piece empower parents/carers to help their loved one or does it disempower them by blaming them (even inadvertently) for the eating disorder?
· Does the piece state that eating disorders are preventable (there is no evidence for this yet)?
Adopting an editorial policy such as that outlined above, combined with encouraging dialogue and discussion without a defensive posture, should lead to positive changes which fulfill the ideas of providing hope to those whose lives are touched by eating disorders.
We are happy to connect by phone or email to hear your thoughts and discuss a timeline for changes; both Mirror-Mirror and Eating Disorder Hope are advocacy and awareness organizations that have made substantial and helpful changes after considering our feedback and we hope you will be moved to do the same.
Respectfully,
International Eating Disorder Action
Web: www.iedaction.weebly.com
Twitter: @IEDAction
FB: groups/ iedaction.global, iedaction
Admins: Evelyn Cohen
Amy Cunningham
Tabitha Farrar
Jennifer Denise Ouellette
Lisa Springer
Subscribe to:
Posts
(
Atom
)